Submit Your Story

Name

Email *

Message *

Monday, March 20, 2017

Publix supermarkets blames and gaslights victims of workplace sexual harassment.

Dearest Friends and supporters---


Today I am writing to you to share with you a very concerning and disgusting story That was brought to my attention by someone in my home town. In the south eastern part of the US we have a very family oriented respected and loved grocery store named Publix. You may have heard of them and their stellar reputation as well as their wonderful treatment of their employees. Up until last week I felt this image was accurate. Things changed quickly when Andrea came forward and told me her story.


Andrea had just started working at Publix in early October, for reasons relating to coverage of missing shifts and rides to work she exchanged numbers with many of her coworkers. One specific coworker named Mr. Addis Parra who is her supervisor informed her that he did not have a cell phone and gave her his email address instead. Thinking nothing of it she emailed him later that day saying “It's Andrea.” to inform him of her email address. He then responded “ok Preciosa”. She didn't respond. Seven hours later he messaged again stating when she had emailed him he was asleep, she did not respond. Not even two hours later he emailed again asking for sexy photos. She again ignored his email. At this point he sent a shirtless photo, Andrea fearing retaliation at work replied with a flirty message of “coño” which means damn and a heart eyes emoji not having seen his next email. In the next email he had asked her if she wanted to see one without clothes. She never responded to this email. She never said yes. Mr Parra sent a photo of his whole body naked with an erect penis. She never responded. He then emailed saying let me know if you like it and send me a naked photo of yourself. She never responded. He then emailed again asking if she had received the second photo she didn't know what to what to say fearing for her job she responded with “no I didn't receive the second photo but I am ok with the first one”.


In that same week Andrea and Mr. Parra were scheduled to work together again. Andrea had hoped that Mr. Parra gotten the point and moved on. Sadly this was not the case. While she was performing inventory in the freezer Mr. Parra entered the freezer and closed the door behind him. He then proceeded to grope Andrea, Andrea pushed him off and ran out of the freezer and went to the bathroom to cry. When she had gathered herself she returned to work hoping this time he had gotten the point that she was not interested. For a week she completely ignored all attempts at conversation and avoided him whenever possible which was extremely difficult considering they worked in the same department. The next week Andrea was again in the freezer doing inventory and Mr. Parra entered the freezer again closing the door behind him. Andrea thought it was another co worker, when she turned around she realized it was him. Mr. Parra forced himself on her and attempted to kiss her stating that he liked her tongue piercing. She again pushed him off left the freezer and returned to work. Ever since then Andrea could not inventory the freezer and had panic attacks whenever she entered the freezer fearing that she would again be assaulted by Mr. Parra.


Andrea attempted to continue working but Mr. Parra kept attempting to talk to her and her panic attacks kept getting worse. She stopped coming to work completely. Andrea's mother, noting her strange behavior and absenteeism from work asked what had happened. When her mother heard the story she insisted Andrea go to her store manager and tell them what happened.
On Tuesday March 14, Andrea and her Mother went to go talk to Ingrid and David the Manager and assistant manager. She told them and showed them everything. Both managers sympathized with her and informed her that he would be immediately suspended and Andrea would be reinstated. Ingrid hugged Andrea and promised everything would be ok and she would contact HR. That same day at 5pm Ingrid called asking Andrea to meet with HR on Wednesday. Andrea agreed and was hopeful she would get some semblance of justice. During the meeting with Maria Daily from HR Andrea disclosed the whole story. Maria informed her that she would then hear his side of the story and make a decision and contact her. During Andrea's meeting, Mr. Parra was still working despite promises to have him suspended. Andrea had yet another panic attack. On Friday Andrea received a call from Maria Daily claiming the evidence Andrea provided was insufficient and that the investigation was closed, she also informed her that she could apply at another Publix if she should so choose. She immediately called the police and filed a report on Mr. Parra for battery and sexual assault.


That same night Andrea and her mother decided to go higher up in the HR chain of command. At this point they contacted me and I called Public Relations asking if they had a comment, the secretary took some notes and said I would be contacted. An hour later I was contacted by a Customer care manager who attempted to ease my concerns but did a poor job. He stated that for confidentiality reasons he could not disclose any data but he “understood how it looks”. I asked for a comment and he stated I would be contacted by someone in Public relations. I have not received a call. On Friday she received a call  from Mr. John Shelton, who explained he was from Human resources and that the conclusion of their investigation was that there was nothing they could do because she sent one flirty message and that she didn't have proof that she was touched. She asked about the emails and pictures she submitted as evidence and he stated that there was nothing inappropriate about the messages since they were both adults. Andrea then asked him if he were in the same situation would he send the photo considering she had not said yes and he responded “of course I would.”


Andrea has had panic attacks ever since, she cannot sleep she cannot eat and now has no employment. She cries all the time and feels she was blamed for her assault by an employer who claims to be “family oriented".

Publix doubted, blamed and gas-lighted her for being abused, all because she sent ONE flirty message which was not YES. Below is photo of Mr Parra.



15 comments:

  1. Such a pathetic excuse of a man... A disgusting employee like him- This just doesn't make me want to shop at Publix anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We are not impressed, Mr. Parra. 👎

    ReplyDelete
  3. Most companies have a no fraternizing policy do they not? If they do could that not be used? Albiet it may be used against her but at least they would show they are making an overture to justice if however minor.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Predator in the making. There may be more girls out there. What a creeper.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I feel he is disgraceful. And quite a desperate person. However not once did the girl say, hey please dont send me messages like that. She encouraged him by sending him cono! Thats encouragrment not a deterrance. So he never "got the point" not to do it, because he was never told not to.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. i disagree that she encouraged him by that "cono" emoji, she was making a joke like most workers do and she also feared retaliation...he sent few emails while she ignored them -- if she didn't reply to any at first, she ain't interested but he persisted anyways; when he did sent a topless picture, she made a joke because she feared retaliation; he sent a nude photo -- he didn't ask if he could send one, she didn't ask for one nor did she sent a sexy photo of herself either -- he went too far; and finally, he forced himself on her -- that is a predator gone too far...if she welcomed his advances, she wouldn't have reported him...even if she ignored his advancement, that don't mean she deserved it...since it's a he said/she said story, her story checks out from emails, if he had any proof that they replied back and forth, and mutual understanding of revealing photos, then she would be in the wrong by evidence but he got nothing...i don't mean to attack or argue with you, just wanted to refute this "victim blaming" thing

      Delete
  6. A stiff one does not make you man. Que PERDEDOR!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Publix, you better fix this, report this man to the authorities,educate your entire staff including HR about Sexual Harrassment and Hostile work environment. Notify PR to release a statement on this particular case and in general.A person should not have to say the words to make it wrong.It's illegal.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is totally unacceptable but Publix is losing credibility on family values any more!

    ReplyDelete
  9. They should have let him go because this is not right at all! She showed them she didn't respond to his improper advances in the messages and an emoji and one message to detour his improper advances does not mean her or any person ( man or woman) is saying yes to someone advances. Publix is in for a "Public(x) pun intended nightmare and that store and all the higher ups involved deserve what they get. This poor woman, is going to need serious therapy I know I still do!

    ReplyDelete